A bitter High Court dispute has broken out involving potential neighbours around the construction of a wall in a coastal web page within a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes captivated national consideration next an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed spouse and children house at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental concerns, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Periods posting about René Collier and also the Irish Instances write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has developed into a extremely publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over construction works at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a firm director respectively, search for to develop their household property. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where by enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of proven citizens. In accordance with the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being made by their future neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted beneath planning authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two people of Dublin Street, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their organizing authorization by creating a wall past the boundaries in their website, bringing about an encroachment on the Distinctive Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as a result areas are matter to strict controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Within their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments might have Long lasting ecological outcomes, specifically inside of a sensitive coastal ecosystem including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach of their organizing authorization, and say the wall, that is partially designed, is in the correct situation. Their lawful team has characterised the action being an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so that you can preserve their see, an allegation that has been repeated in courtroom and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal planning disputes, exactly where views of The ocean are both equally really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary endeavours via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the location, In keeping with sworn evidence referenced during the Irish Situations. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by means of waist-high h2o all through a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Periods, an image which includes due to the fact turn into emblematic in the depth with the dispute. These steps were not merely symbolic; they ended up intended to Assemble visual proof in the wall’s position relative to tidal strains and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website from the sea Irish Periods noted, describing how The 2 Males entered the drinking water throughout intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm water to photograph the location turned Among the most striking descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Situations write-up about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that this kind of actions were being cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a region influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was remaining encroached upon.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been included in detail via the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Moments 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as audience sought to comprehend the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to even further submissions on regardless of whether interim orders really should be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical minute from the authorized timeline.
With the core in the dispute is actually a disagreement above boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage that the wall, as built, goes beyond what was approved and intrudes into protected land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has become described as meticulous in his assessment of setting up paperwork, maps, and conditions hooked up on the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those stressed that their motion is determined by concern for environmental defense and adherence to organizing regulation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A non-public view, insisting in its place that it is about making sure that growth at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they have described their extensive-standing link to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a couple basically trying to make a family property in accordance with the law. They deny the wall encroaches with a Particular Space of Conservation and say that all performs have been carried out determined by professional suggestions and accredited designs. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes getting into the sea through a storm, never alter the fundamental points.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how setting up disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute in excess of development of wall at coastal internet site has grown to be a shorthand description for your condition that numerous observers see as increasingly common. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation amongst private land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become more contentious.
The Irish Times posting about René Collier observed the businessman had Beforehand been involved with neighborhood advocacy on planning and environmental challenges, while not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Situations short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from extremely distinctive Specialist backgrounds can find them selves aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, are becoming synonymous Using the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from your sea Irish Situations coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-high drinking water all through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations and René Collier waded by means of waistline-high water for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting each the physical actuality on the coastline as Paul Feely and René Collier well as symbolic nature in the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an too much approach.
Since the High Court proceedings keep on, the result continues to be unsure. The court docket need to establish if the wall as built complies with preparing permission and no matter whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Place of Conservation has transpired. The authorized arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and organizing situations. But the human component remains central: neighbours who must Are living along with each other long once the authorized fees happen to be paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development performs at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, although the implications of the case extend outside of that deal with. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the importance of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. In addition, it underscores how rapidly an area disagreement can escalate when basic issues for instance environmental safety and assets rights are perceived being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of normal elegance and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre in the dispute stands partly built, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized thoughts. No matter whether it will in the end be altered, eradicated, or accomplished as prepared will count on the court’s findings. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably go on to appear in headlines, connected indelibly to Probably the most carefully viewed arranging disputes in north Dublin in recent times.